The Funniest Way To Bypass YouTube Copyright Measures
Worrying About Twitter Security? Get Over It

Should we cry over wasted ink?

Peter Kafka recently pondered the state of the publishing industry - what does it say about a publisher when they create mindless search-driven content such as "What Times Does The Oscars Start?".  

While many would consider this mindless content evil, I'm not convinced that this is the case. In a digital medium, the cost of wasted ink is generally so low that it can be ignored all-together. I don't believe any publication would want to give these link-bait articles serious homepage real estate. But there is little tangible harm in publishing a piece of boring, informational content.

This shallow content does little to build a brand image or reputation. But every click is an impression, an opportunity to make a penny or two and to build a broader experience. Once someone is on the publisher domain, they can be served more relevant, quality content recommendations from the publisher's more beefy content.

Is SEO-driven journalistically-empty content really an evil? This cat-and-mouse game of search optimization is our new content reality. Let the smartest publisher win.

Comments